PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. HAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 41.41% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed HAL with an annualized return of 9.91%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively lower 0.88% annualized return.


XLE

1D
0.75%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
29.56%
6M
28.37%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
9.91%

HAL

1D
-0.40%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
41.41%
6M
39.63%
1Y
74.73%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
0.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.56%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
HAL
Halliburton Company
41.41%7.02%-23.19%-6.47%74.45%21.99%-21.23%-4.90%-44.63%-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and HAL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.80

The correlation between XLE and HAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL
HAL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLEHALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

6.47

-3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

16.47

-7.83

XLE vs. HAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the HAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and HAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and HAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEHALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-92.99%

+21.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-13.10%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-54.01%

+33.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-54.01%

+27.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-91.45%

+24.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-32.89%

+24.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-39.12%

+21.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

5.14%

-0.82%

Volatility

XLE vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 7.26%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEHALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

9.32%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

24.13%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.57%

36.76%

-16.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.05%

40.18%

-14.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

45.96%

-16.38%

Dividends

XLE vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than HAL's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAL
Halliburton Company
1.72%2.41%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and HAL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs HAL's -92.99%.

HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and HAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer