XLE vs. EFG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and EFG (iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while EFG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 10.02%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for EFG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EFG.

Performance

XLE vs. EFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than EFG's 6.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed EFG with an annualized return of 10.02%, while EFG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.09% annualized return.

XLE

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: 31.32%
• 6M: 30.37%
• 1Y: 44.35%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: 20.33%
• 10Y*: 10.02%

EFG

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 6M: 7.52%
• 1Y: 11.82%
• 3Y*: 10.54%
• 5Y*: 3.87%
• 10Y*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. EFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	31.32%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	64.32%	53.28%	-32.67%	11.74%	-18.22%	-0.89%
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	6.44%	20.70%	1.53%	17.55%	-23.12%	11.01%	17.85%	27.47%	-12.93%	28.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and EFG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005	0.52

The correlation between XLE and EFG shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. EFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLE	EFG
Energy	100.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Communication Services	-	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.1%
Financial Services	-	10.6%
Healthcare	-	14.2%
Industrials	-	29.6%
Real Estate	-	1.0%
Technology	-	18.1%
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

XLE vs. EFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 70
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

EFG

EFG Risk / Return Rank: 23
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 21
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. EFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLE	EFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	0.68	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	1.07	+1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.13	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	0.93	+2.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.59	3.41	+7.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLE vs. EFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the EFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and EFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLE	EFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	0.68	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.21	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.46	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.29	+0.02

Drawdowns

XLE vs. EFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than EFG's maximum drawdown of -58.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and EFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLE	EFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.26%	-58.40%	-12.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.05%	-12.78%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	-16.87%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.04%	-35.78%	+9.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.81%	-35.78%	-31.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.76%	-2.28%	-4.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.98%	-12.15%	-5.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.20%	3.47%	+0.73%

Volatility

XLE vs. EFG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) at 5.78%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLE	EFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	5.78%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.58%	14.82%	+1.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.48%	17.48%	+3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.03%	18.18%	+7.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	17.73%	+11.85%

XLE vs. EFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EFG's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLE vs. EFG - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than EFG's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF	2.37%	2.53%	1.64%	1.63%	1.27%	1.54%	0.85%	1.69%	1.98%	1.56%	2.20%	1.75%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.56%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLE and EFG in my portfolio?

XLE and EFG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLE or EFG?

XLE has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to EFG (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs EFG's -58.40%.

Which ETF is better, XLE or EFG?

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.02% vs 8.09% for EFG. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EFG has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLE or EFG?

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLE or EFG?

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLE or EFG?

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.37% for EFG.

What is the main difference between XLE and EFG?

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while EFG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.40% for EFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.