PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLCI vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLCI vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 10.06% return.


XLCI

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.56%
6M
-4.49%
YTD
-2.58%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.98%

SPYG

1D
1.45%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.50%
YTD
10.06%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
7.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$321.11M$273.47M$308.09M
$102.51K$79.36K$72.31K

XLCI vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLCI and SPYG is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.50

The correlation between XLCI and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLCI vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLCI
SPYG

Communication Services

100.0%
15.6%

Financial Services

99.8%
8.7%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Industrials

-

6.4%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

52.3%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Communication Services

XLCI
100.0%
SPYG
15.6%

Financial Services

XLCI
99.8%
SPYG
8.7%

Basic Materials

XLCI

-

SPYG
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLCI

-

SPYG
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

XLCI

-

SPYG
1.0%

Energy

XLCI

-

SPYG
0.1%

Healthcare

XLCI

-

SPYG
6.2%

Industrials

XLCI

-

SPYG
6.4%

Real Estate

XLCI

-

SPYG
0.6%

Technology

XLCI

-

SPYG
52.3%

Utilities

XLCI

-

SPYG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLCI vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLCI
XLCI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLCI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XLCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLCI vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLCISPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.19

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.42

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

5.17

-3.93

XLCI vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLCI and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLCI vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCISPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-67.63%

+59.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-13.76%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-4.33%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-24.20%

+22.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.78%

-0.92%

Volatility

XLCI vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) is 5.62%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that XLCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCISPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

6.08%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

14.85%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

18.18%

-5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

21.50%

-9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

20.79%

-8.50%

XLCI vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLCI vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than SPYG's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.49%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XLCI
State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.73%5.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLCI and SPYG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to XLCI (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLCI dropped -8.44% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 1-year performance, SPYG leads with 21.72% vs 4.28% for XLCI. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XLCI has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 21.72% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLCI.

XLCI has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 0.49% for SPYG.

XLCI is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPYG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLCI and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer