XLCI vs. AVGW

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

XLCI (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLCI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AVGW.

Performance

XLCI vs. AVGW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than AVGW's 2.39% return.

XLCI

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.03%
• YTD: -2.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVGW

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: -29.80%
• 6M: 2.39%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLCI vs. AVGW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	-2.03%	6.73%
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	2.39%	16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XLCI and AVGW is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.22

XLCI vs. AVGW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLCI	AVGW
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Financial Services	99.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	30.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLCI vs. AVGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

XLCI vs. AVGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum AVGW drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and AVGW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLCI	AVGW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-34.65%	+26.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.01%	-29.80%	+24.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-13.16%	+11.32%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLCI	AVGW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.48%	56.91%	-45.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.48%	56.91%	-45.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.48%	56.91%	-45.43%

XLCI vs. AVGW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLCI vs. AVGW - Dividend Comparison

XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, less than AVGW's 70.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	70.10%	31.15%
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.66%	5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLCI and AVGW in my portfolio?

XLCI and AVGW have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLCI or AVGW?

On fees, XLCI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLCI or AVGW?

XLCI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLCI or AVGW?

AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 70.10%, compared with 11.66% for XLCI.

What is the main difference between XLCI and AVGW?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.99% for AVGW.