PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLC vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLC vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 3.11% return.


XLC

1D
-1.31%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
-4.49%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*

XLU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
3.11%
6M
1.25%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLC vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-4.49%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%15.96%26.90%31.05%-16.88%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.11%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and XLU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2018

0.28

The correlation between XLC and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLC vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLC
XLU

Communication Services

95.1%

-

Technology

4.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Communication Services

XLC
95.1%
XLU

-

Technology

XLC
4.7%
XLU

-

Basic Materials

XLC

-

XLU

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLC

-

XLU

-

Consumer Defensive

XLC

-

XLU

-

Energy

XLC

-

XLU

-

Financial Services

XLC

-

XLU

-

Healthcare

XLC

-

XLU

-

Industrials

XLC

-

XLU

-

Real Estate

XLC

-

XLU

-

Utilities

XLC

-

XLU
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLC vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLC vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLCXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.00

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

2.24

+1.48

XLC vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLC and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLCXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.63

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.54

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.40

+0.13

Drawdowns

XLC vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-51.98%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-9.18%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-17.26%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.65%

-25.26%

-21.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.36%

-7.78%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-10.22%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.09%

-0.95%

Volatility

XLC vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is 3.67%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that XLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

5.41%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

11.53%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

14.57%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

17.32%

+3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

19.26%

+2.94%

XLC vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLC vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than XLU's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.25%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.72%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLC and XLU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to XLC (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 5-year performance, XLU leads with 9.25% vs 8.28% for XLC. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.25% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.25% for XLC.

XLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.08% for XLU.

XLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLC and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer