XLC vs. BIL
Compare and contrast key facts about Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL).
XLC and BIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2018. BIL is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Month Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007. Both XLC and BIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLC vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLC vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -5.53% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.88% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.85% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -5.53% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 0.85% return.
XLC
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -5.53%
- 6M
- -5.74%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLC vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLC vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
XLC
BIL
XLC vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLC | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 19.52 | -18.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 254.04 | -252.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 180.28 | -179.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 365.54 | -363.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 4,104.04 | -4,098.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLC | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 19.52 | -18.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 12.54 | -12.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 2.72 | -2.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLC and BIL is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
XLC vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than BIL's 4.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.26% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.01% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
XLC vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and BIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLC | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -0.78% | -45.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -0.01% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.65% | -0.12% | -46.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | 0.00% | -7.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -0.26% | -10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 0.00% | +3.25% |
Volatility
XLC vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that XLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLC | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 0.05% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 0.14% | +9.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 0.21% | +18.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 0.26% | +20.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 0.26% | +22.11% |