PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XJR having a 20.97% return and SPSM slightly higher at 21.15%.


XJR

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.09%
6M
15.44%
YTD
20.97%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*

SPSM

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.19%
6M
15.20%
YTD
21.15%
1Y
30.30%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
20.97%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
21.15%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%36.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and SPSM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.99

The correlation between XJR and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJR vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XJR
SPSM

Financial Services

18.2%
17.7%

Technology

17.0%
15.5%

Industrials

15.3%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
12.8%

Healthcare

10.7%
12.2%

Real Estate

7.6%
7.3%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.4%

Energy

4.7%
5.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.9%

Utilities

2.0%
1.7%

Financial Services

XJR
18.2%
SPSM
17.7%

Technology

XJR
17.0%
SPSM
15.5%

Industrials

XJR
15.3%
SPSM
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XJR
13.3%
SPSM
12.8%

Healthcare

XJR
10.7%
SPSM
12.2%

Real Estate

XJR
7.6%
SPSM
7.3%

Basic Materials

XJR
4.7%
SPSM
4.4%

Energy

XJR
4.7%
SPSM
5.9%

Communication Services

XJR
2.7%
SPSM
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

XJR
2.6%
SPSM
3.9%

Utilities

XJR
2.0%
SPSM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJRSPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.49

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

11.75

-2.24

XJR vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJR vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRSPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-42.89%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-8.72%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-27.94%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-27.94%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-2.25%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-7.87%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.59%

+0.32%

Volatility

XJR vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) at 4.57%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRSPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

4.57%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

12.00%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

17.51%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

21.37%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.64%

22.94%

-1.30%

XJR vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJR vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than SPSM's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.39%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.94%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XJR and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XJR has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to SPSM (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs SPSM's -42.89%.

On 5-year performance, SPSM leads with 7.68% vs 7.39% for XJR. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPSM has performed better with a 7.68% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XJR.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.94% for XJR.

XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.03% for SPSM.

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer