XJR vs. SMLV
XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJR returned 5.18%/yr vs 8.02%/yr for SMLV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
XJR vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XJR having a 15.29% return and SMLV slightly lower at 14.81%.
XJR
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.18%
- 10Y*
- —
SMLV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
XJR vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 15.29% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 14.81% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | 31.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and SMLV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between XJR and SMLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
XJR vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XJR
SMLV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
XJR
SMLV
Technology
XJR
SMLV
Industrials
XJR
SMLV
Consumer Cyclical
XJR
SMLV
Healthcare
XJR
SMLV
Real Estate
XJR
SMLV
Energy
XJR
SMLV
Basic Materials
XJR
SMLV
Consumer Defensive
XJR
SMLV
Communication Services
XJR
SMLV
Utilities
XJR
SMLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJR vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank
XJR
SMLV
XJR vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJR | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.21 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.42 | 8.78 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJR | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.44 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.55 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SMLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJR | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -42.45% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -7.34% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -20.40% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -20.40% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | 0.00% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -5.45% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.68% | +0.25% |
Volatility
XJR vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) at 4.09%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJR | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 4.09% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 9.92% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 15.73% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 18.29% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 20.96% | +0.77% |
XJR vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XJR and SMLV have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XJR vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SMLV's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.31% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XJR and SMLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XJR has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to SMLV (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs SMLV's -42.45%.
On 5-year performance, SMLV leads with 8.02% vs 5.18% for XJR. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 8.02% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJR and SMLV have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.
XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.
XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJR and SMLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer