PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XJR having a 15.29% return and SMLV slightly lower at 14.81%.


XJR

1D
0.74%
1M
0.49%
YTD
15.29%
6M
14.96%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*

SMLV

1D
0.20%
1M
1.40%
YTD
14.81%
6M
15.50%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.29%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
14.81%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%31.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and SMLV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.93

The correlation between XJR and SMLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJR vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XJR
SMLV

Financial Services

18.2%
30.5%

Technology

16.8%
11.2%

Industrials

15.5%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
8.7%

Healthcare

10.7%
8.7%

Real Estate

7.6%
12.2%

Energy

4.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.3%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.2%

Utilities

2.0%
2.9%

Financial Services

XJR
18.2%
SMLV
30.5%

Technology

XJR
16.8%
SMLV
11.2%

Industrials

XJR
15.5%
SMLV
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XJR
13.5%
SMLV
8.7%

Healthcare

XJR
10.7%
SMLV
8.7%

Real Estate

XJR
7.6%
SMLV
12.2%

Energy

XJR
4.7%
SMLV
1.8%

Basic Materials

XJR
4.5%
SMLV
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

XJR
2.7%
SMLV
4.3%

Communication Services

XJR
2.5%
SMLV
2.2%

Utilities

XJR
2.0%
SMLV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XJRSMLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.21

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

8.78

+0.64

XJR vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XJRSMLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.44

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.55

+0.12

Drawdowns

XJR vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRSMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-42.45%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-7.34%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-20.40%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-20.40%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

0.00%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-5.45%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.68%

+0.25%

Volatility

XJR vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) at 4.09%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRSMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

4.09%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

9.92%

+2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

15.73%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

18.29%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

20.96%

+0.77%

XJR vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XJR and SMLV have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJR vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SMLV's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XJR and SMLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XJR has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to SMLV (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 5-year performance, SMLV leads with 8.02% vs 5.18% for XJR. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 8.02% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJR and SMLV have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.

XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer