XJR vs. SMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV).
XJR and SMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XJR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. Both XJR and SMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XJR vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XJR vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 2.25% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 4.65% | 0.26% | 7.03% | 8.99% | -5.90% | 18.98% | 26.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than SMDV's 4.65% return.
XJR
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 17.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SMDV
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XJR vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XJR vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank
XJR
SMDV
XJR vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJR | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 0.42 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 0.75 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 0.71 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 2.07 | +2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJR | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.42 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.19 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.37 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and SMDV is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XJR vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SMDV's 2.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.51% | 2.67% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.35% | 1.81% |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SMDV drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJR | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -34.12% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.40% | -10.94% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -21.23% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -6.47% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -5.99% | -3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 3.73% | +0.06% |
Volatility
XJR vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) at 4.27%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XJR | SMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 4.27% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 10.67% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 18.24% | +4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 18.71% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 20.71% | +1.17% |