XJR vs. SLYV

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJR returned 7.85%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for SLYV. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XJR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.

Performance

XJR vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XJR having a 22.36% return and SLYV slightly lower at 21.58%.

XJR

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 2.27%
• 6M: 16.66%
• YTD: 22.36%
• 1Y: 30.26%
• 3Y*: 14.23%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.30%

SLYV

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 3.09%
• 6M: 15.21%
• YTD: 21.58%
• 1Y: 36.29%
• 3Y*: 13.57%
• 5Y*: 8.65%
• 10Y*: 10.21%
• ALL TIME*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF	22.36%	4.73%	9.59%	16.39%	-17.30%	24.96%	35.61%
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF	21.58%	6.54%	7.28%	14.82%	-11.08%	30.57%	38.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and SLYV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020	0.97

The correlation between XJR and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJR vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XJR	SLYV
Financial Services	17.7%	21.2%
Technology	16.2%	12.2%
Industrials	15.8%	12.4%
Consumer Cyclical	13.9%	14.3%
Healthcare	12.6%	7.8%
Real Estate	7.7%	8.1%
Basic Materials	4.5%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	5.0%
Communication Services	3.3%	3.8%
Energy	3.1%	7.5%
Utilities	1.5%	1.8%

Return for Risk

XJR vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR

XJR Risk / Return Rank: 74
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 76

SLYV

SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 85
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XJR	SLYV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	2.04	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.96	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.35	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	3.89	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.38	12.97	-2.59

XJR vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XJR vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SLYV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XJR	SLYV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.14%	-61.15%	+34.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-9.36%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.14%	-28.68%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.14%	-28.68%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-0.54%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.29%	-8.90%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	2.81%	+0.11%

Volatility

XJR vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 3.58%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XJR	SLYV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	3.58%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	11.61%	+0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.75%	17.87%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.32%	21.73%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.61%	23.90%	-2.29%

XJR vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XJR vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than SLYV's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF	1.80%	2.02%	2.30%	2.11%	1.47%	1.94%	1.40%	1.67%	2.14%	5.53%	2.18%	6.55%
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF	0.93%	1.14%	1.96%	0.92%	1.29%	2.00%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XJR and SLYV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, XJR and SLYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XJR or SLYV?

XJR has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to SLYV (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

Which ETF is better, XJR or SLYV?

On 5-year performance, SLYV leads with 8.65% vs 7.85% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XJR or SLYV?

Over the 5-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 7.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XJR or SLYV?

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XJR or SLYV?

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.93% for XJR.

What is the main difference between XJR and SLYV?

XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.15% for SLYV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.