XJR vs. ISCMF
XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XJR returned 16.10%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. XJR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
XJR vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
XJR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XJR vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.44% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -11.28% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and ISCMF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJR vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
XJR
ISCMF
XJR vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XJR | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 2.31 | -1.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 5.53 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 11.85 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XJR vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJR | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -25.42% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -5.69% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -7.62% | -19.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -5.26% | +4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -13.35% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.65% | +0.26% |
Volatility
XJR vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJR | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 5.11% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 15.45% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 17.84% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 14.29% | +7.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 14.29% | +7.41% |
XJR vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XJR vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.96% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XJR and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XJR has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to ISCMF (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs 16.10% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 16.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ISCMF.
XJR has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.19% for ISCMF.
XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJR and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer