PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 8.30% return.


XJR

1D
-0.96%
1M
2.16%
YTD
14.91%
6M
13.91%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*

CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
14.91%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%37.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and CSB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.91

The correlation between XJR and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJR vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XJR
CSB

Financial Services

18.2%
26.5%

Technology

16.8%
1.2%

Industrials

15.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
19.0%

Healthcare

10.7%
0.4%

Real Estate

7.6%

-

Energy

4.7%
11.5%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.4%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.6%

Utilities

2.0%
22.0%

Financial Services

XJR
18.2%
CSB
26.5%

Technology

XJR
16.8%
CSB
1.2%

Industrials

XJR
15.5%
CSB
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XJR
13.5%
CSB
19.0%

Healthcare

XJR
10.7%
CSB
0.4%

Real Estate

XJR
7.6%
CSB

-

Energy

XJR
4.7%
CSB
11.5%

Basic Materials

XJR
4.5%
CSB
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

XJR
2.7%
CSB
4.4%

Communication Services

XJR
2.5%
CSB
3.6%

Utilities

XJR
2.0%
CSB
22.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XJRCSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.51

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

7.26

+2.44

XJR vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XJRCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.25

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.20

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.45

+0.22

Drawdowns

XJR vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-42.07%

+14.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-7.18%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-21.82%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-24.49%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-3.12%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-7.14%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.48%

+0.45%

Volatility

XJR vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

3.59%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

9.19%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

14.54%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

18.78%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

21.31%

+0.42%

XJR vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XJR vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJR and CSB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XJR has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 5-year performance, XJR leads with 5.38% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XJR has performed better with a 5.38% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.

XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.35% for CSB.

XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer