XJH vs. GRNJ
XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. XJH is passively managed, while GRNJ is actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XJH charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.
Performance
XJH vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJH achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than GRNJ's 10.37% return.
XJH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.69%
GRNJ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.46M | $7.36M | $6.27M | |
| $620.32K | $955.16K | $1.17M |
XJH vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.85% | 5.99% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 10.37% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJH and GRNJ is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJH vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank
XJH
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XJH vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XJH | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XJH vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and GRNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJH | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -17.45% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -13.50% | +11.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -4.94% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility
XJH vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJH | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 30.96% | -14.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 30.96% | -11.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 30.96% | -11.21% |
XJH vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XJH vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison
XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.09% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 1.04% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XJH and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XJH is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XJH is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
XJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJH and 0.75% for GRNJ.
Find the right allocation for XJH and GRNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer