GRNJ vs. AVUV
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNJ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fundstrat, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRNJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
GRNJ vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GRNJ having a 21.21% return and AVUV slightly higher at 21.53%.
GRNJ
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 21.21%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 6M
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 38.52%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 21.21% | 6.02% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 21.53% | 7.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and AVUV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVUV
GRNJ vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.32% | -49.42% | +32.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.00% | -0.97% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -7.89% | +3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.68% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.78% | 17.62% | +13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 22.64% | +8.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 28.21% | +2.57% |
GRNJ vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.27% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and AVUV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
GRNJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.25% for AVUV.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer