PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNJ vs. FFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRNJ vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNJ achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's 20.94% return.


GRNJ

1D
-2.56%
1M
1.56%
YTD
22.19%
6M
17.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFTY

1D
-4.21%
1M
5.39%
YTD
20.94%
6M
18.21%
1Y
36.43%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNJ vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
22.19%6.02%
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
20.94%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNJ and FFTY is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRNJ vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNJ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNJ vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRNJFFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.14

GRNJ vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRNJ vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and FFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNJFFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.32%

-59.46%

+42.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-14.76%

+10.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-22.34%

+18.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.82%

Volatility

GRNJ vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNJFFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.86%

35.99%

-5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.86%

29.63%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.86%

27.67%

+3.19%

GRNJ vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRNJ vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
1.11%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRNJ and FFTY have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GRNJ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRNJ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

GRNJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.80% for FFTY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRNJ and FFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer