GRNJ vs. FFTY
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNJ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fundstrat, while FFTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. GRNJ is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GRNJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
GRNJ vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNJ achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's 6.26% return.
GRNJ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- -2.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $863.41K | $1.19M | $1.59M | |
| $4.46M | $7.36M | $6.27M |
GRNJ vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 10.37% | 6.02% |
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 6.26% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and FFTY is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FFTY
GRNJ vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -59.46% | +42.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.50% | -25.10% | +11.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -22.32% | +17.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.51% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.96% | 36.53% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 29.75% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 27.79% | +3.17% |
GRNJ vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 1.27% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and FFTY have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRNJ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRNJ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
GRNJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FFTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and CapForce. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.80% for FFTY.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer