PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XITK vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XITK vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's 5.41% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 12.77%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.


XITK

1D
-2.62%
1M
-5.67%
6M
2.27%
YTD
2.43%
1Y
-1.66%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
-3.10%
10Y*
12.77%

XLV

1D
2.22%
1M
6.26%
6M
3.96%
YTD
5.41%
1Y
22.63%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
2.43%2.53%19.12%45.87%-47.45%-11.24%90.22%36.98%7.60%36.01%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.41%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and XLV is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between XITK and XLV has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XITK vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XITK
XLV

Technology

82.4%

-

Communication Services

10.4%

-

Healthcare

3.1%
100.0%

Industrials

1.6%

-

Financial Services

1.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XITK
82.4%
XLV

-

Communication Services

XITK
10.4%
XLV

-

Healthcare

XITK
3.1%
XLV
100.0%

Industrials

XITK
1.6%
XLV

-

Financial Services

XITK
1.3%
XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

XITK
0.8%
XLV

-

Real Estate

XITK
0.4%
XLV

-

Basic Materials

XITK

-

XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

XITK

-

XLV

-

Energy

XITK

-

XLV

-

Utilities

XITK

-

XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XITK vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK
XITK Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XITKXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.25

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

2.17

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.13

5.14

-5.27

XITK vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XITK vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XITKXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.56%

-39.17%

-26.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-10.47%

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.18%

-17.11%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

-17.11%

-44.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.56%

-28.40%

-37.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.16%

-1.61%

-28.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.13%

-7.10%

-15.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.36%

4.42%

+7.94%

Volatility

XITK vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 6.40%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XITKXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

6.40%

+3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.80%

11.88%

+12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.67%

15.88%

+12.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.03%

14.99%

+18.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.66%

16.62%

+13.04%

XITK vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XITK vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.14%1.50%1.74%1.88%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.57%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XITK and XLV have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XITK has higher volatility (9.66%) compared to XLV (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs XLV's -39.17%.

On 10-year performance, XITK leads with 12.77% vs 9.95% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 6.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XITK has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.08% for XLV.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XITK and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer