XITK vs. PXQ
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XITK tracks the FactSet Innovative Technology Index while PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XITK returned 12.77%/yr vs 19.34%/yr for PXQ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PXQ.
Performance
XITK vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 41.05% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed PXQ with an annualized return of 12.77%, while PXQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.34% annualized return.
XITK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- -1.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
PXQ
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- 6M
- 35.91%
- YTD
- 41.05%
- 1Y
- 63.57%
- 3Y*
- 34.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.56%
- 10Y*
- 19.34%
XITK vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 2.43% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 45.87% | -47.45% | -11.24% | 90.22% | 36.98% | 7.60% | 36.01% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 41.05% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 26.35% | 5.78% | 15.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and PXQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between XITK and PXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XITK vs. PXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
PXQ
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XITK
PXQ
Communication Services
XITK
PXQ
Healthcare
XITK
PXQ
-
Industrials
XITK
PXQ
Financial Services
XITK
PXQ
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
PXQ
-
Real Estate
XITK
PXQ
Basic Materials
XITK
-
PXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
PXQ
-
Energy
XITK
-
PXQ
-
Utilities
XITK
-
PXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
PXQ
XITK vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XITK | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.40 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 4.49 | -4.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 17.73 | -17.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XITK vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than PXQ's maximum drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and PXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -57.18% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -14.23% | -13.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -21.40% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -34.55% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | -34.55% | -31.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.16% | -14.23% | -15.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -10.72% | -11.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.36% | 3.60% | +8.76% |
Volatility
XITK vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) is 9.66%, while Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a volatility of 12.40%. This indicates that XITK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | PXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 12.40% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.80% | 23.77% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.67% | 26.60% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.03% | 24.31% | +8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.66% | 23.43% | +6.23% |
XITK vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison
XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and PXQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXQ has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to XITK (9.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs PXQ's -57.18%.
On 10-year performance, PXQ leads with 19.34% vs 12.77% for XITK. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XITK has been the lower-risk option at 9.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.
PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.40% for PXQ.
PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and PXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer