XITK vs. ITEQ
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XITK tracks the FactSet Innovative Technology Index while ITEQ tracks the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XITK returned 13.96%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for ITEQ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ITEQ.
Performance
XITK vs. ITEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than ITEQ's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has outperformed ITEQ with an annualized return of 13.96%, while ITEQ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.97% annualized return.
XITK
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- -0.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
ITEQ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
XITK vs. ITEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 1.90% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 45.87% | -47.45% | -11.24% | 90.22% | 36.98% | 7.60% | 36.01% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 8.97% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and ITEQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XITK and ITEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
XITK vs. ITEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
ITEQ
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XITK
ITEQ
Communication Services
XITK
ITEQ
Healthcare
XITK
ITEQ
Industrials
XITK
ITEQ
Financial Services
XITK
ITEQ
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
ITEQ
Real Estate
XITK
ITEQ
-
Basic Materials
XITK
-
ITEQ
-
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
ITEQ
-
Energy
XITK
-
ITEQ
Utilities
XITK
-
ITEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. ITEQ — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
ITEQ
XITK vs. ITEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XITK | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.12 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 1.20 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 3.04 | -3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XITK vs. ITEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than ITEQ's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and ITEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -54.63% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -13.07% | -14.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -26.78% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -50.29% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | -54.63% | -10.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.52% | -19.26% | -11.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -18.50% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.17% | 5.15% | +7.02% |
Volatility
XITK vs. ITEQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) at 9.34%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.20% | 9.34% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.82% | 18.81% | +5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.92% | 23.79% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 25.20% | +7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 23.48% | +6.23% |
XITK vs. ITEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ITEQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. ITEQ - Dividend Comparison
XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and ITEQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XITK has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to ITEQ (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs ITEQ's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, XITK leads with 13.96% vs 10.97% for ITEQ. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XITK has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.75% for ITEQ.
ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and ITEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer