ITEQ vs. HACK
ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ITEQ tracks the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index while HACK tracks the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ returned 10.76%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for HACK. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITEQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.
Performance
ITEQ vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 19.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ has underperformed HACK with an annualized return of 10.76%, while HACK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.
ITEQ
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- -1.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
HACK
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 19.40%
- 6M
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
ITEQ vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 10.21% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 19.40% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 37.44% | -28.16% | 7.03% | 41.51% | 23.39% | 6.61% | 19.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEQ and HACK is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2015 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ITEQ and HACK shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITEQ vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITEQ
HACK
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
ITEQ
HACK
Industrials
ITEQ
HACK
Utilities
ITEQ
HACK
-
Financial Services
ITEQ
HACK
Consumer Cyclical
ITEQ
HACK
-
Healthcare
ITEQ
HACK
-
Energy
ITEQ
HACK
-
Communication Services
ITEQ
HACK
-
Basic Materials
ITEQ
-
HACK
-
Consumer Defensive
ITEQ
-
HACK
-
Real Estate
ITEQ
-
HACK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITEQ vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
ITEQ
HACK
ITEQ vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITEQ | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.11 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 0.69 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 1.61 | +2.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITEQ vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and HACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEQ | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -42.68% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -20.67% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.78% | -21.90% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.29% | -38.68% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.63% | -38.68% | -15.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.35% | -8.93% | -9.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.50% | -11.62% | -6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 8.80% | -3.72% |
Volatility
ITEQ vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) is 10.20%, while Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that ITEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITEQ | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 11.83% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.83% | 21.94% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 26.06% | -2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 24.30% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 23.25% | +0.24% |
ITEQ vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITEQ vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.77% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITEQ and HACK have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HACK has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to ITEQ (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs HACK's -42.68%.
On 10-year performance, HACK leads with 15.64% vs 10.76% for ITEQ. On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HACK has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.
ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.60% for HACK.
ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITEQ and HACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer