PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITEQ vs. HACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITEQ vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 32.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ITEQ has underperformed HACK with an annualized return of 9.68%, while HACK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.


ITEQ

1D
0.66%
1M
-5.78%
6M
2.26%
YTD
7.51%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
-1.90%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
8.93%

HACK

1D
1.20%
1M
-0.17%
6M
38.24%
YTD
32.87%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
15.86%
ALL TIME*
13.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.39M$24.21M$17.68M
$217.34K$197.61K$295.84K

ITEQ vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
7.51%13.71%11.70%4.70%-30.36%-8.04%58.96%37.59%-0.63%26.87%
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
32.87%7.97%23.49%37.44%-28.16%7.03%41.51%23.39%6.61%19.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ITEQ and HACK is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2015

0.81

The correlation between ITEQ and HACK shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ITEQ vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITEQ
HACK

Technology

64.1%
89.7%

Industrials

11.2%
9.9%

Utilities

9.1%

-

Financial Services

5.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

4.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%

-

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Energy

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

ITEQ
64.1%
HACK
89.7%

Industrials

ITEQ
11.2%
HACK
9.9%

Utilities

ITEQ
9.1%
HACK

-

Financial Services

ITEQ
5.1%
HACK
0.3%

Healthcare

ITEQ
4.4%
HACK

-

Consumer Cyclical

ITEQ
3.3%
HACK

-

Communication Services

ITEQ
2.9%
HACK

-

Energy

ITEQ
1.4%
HACK

-

Basic Materials

ITEQ

-

HACK

-

Consumer Defensive

ITEQ

-

HACK

-

Real Estate

ITEQ

-

HACK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITEQ vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITEQ
ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITEQ vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITEQHACKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.26

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

2.95

+0.12

ITEQ vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITEQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITEQ and HACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITEQ vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and HACK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITEQHACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-42.68%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-20.67%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.90%

-21.90%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.29%

-38.68%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.63%

-38.68%

-15.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.34%

-6.56%

-13.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-11.55%

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

8.81%

-3.52%

Volatility

ITEQ vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) is 7.56%, while Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that ITEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITEQHACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

8.88%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.89%

23.39%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.56%

27.37%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.32%

24.64%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.55%

23.36%

+0.19%

ITEQ vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITEQ vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
0.79%0.85%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITEQ and HACK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HACK has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to ITEQ (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITEQ dropped -54.63% vs HACK's -42.68%.

On 10-year performance, HACK leads with 15.86% vs 9.68% for ITEQ. On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HACK has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.

ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index, while HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ITEQ and 0.60% for HACK.

HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITEQ and HACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer