XITK vs. GLDM
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XITK returned -0.31%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
XITK vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.
XITK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 12.45%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XITK vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 13.97% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 45.87% | -47.45% | -11.24% | 90.22% | 36.98% | -12.77% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and GLDM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.09 |
XITK vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
GLDM
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XITK
GLDM
-
Communication Services
XITK
GLDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
GLDM
-
Industrials
XITK
GLDM
-
Financial Services
XITK
GLDM
-
Healthcare
XITK
GLDM
-
Real Estate
XITK
GLDM
-
Basic Materials
XITK
-
GLDM
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
GLDM
-
Energy
XITK
-
GLDM
-
Utilities
XITK
-
GLDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
GLDM
XITK vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XITK | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.25 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 1.70 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 4.23 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XITK | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.24 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 1.04 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.02 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
XITK vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -21.63% | -43.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -19.14% | -8.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -19.14% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -20.92% | -40.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.29% | -17.65% | -4.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.08% | -6.22% | -15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 7.69% | +4.27% |
Volatility
XITK vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.47%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.59% | 5.47% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.87% | 22.99% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.50% | 26.39% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 17.91% | +14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 16.85% | +12.72% |
XITK vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither XITK nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and GLDM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XITK has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to GLDM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs -0.31% for XITK. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs -0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.
XITK and GLDM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GLDM is Gold. XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.10% for GLDM.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer