XITK vs. GLDM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XITK returned -3.10%/yr vs 16.93%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

XITK vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -7.79% return.

XITK

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -5.67%
• 6M: 2.27%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 1Y: -1.66%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: -3.10%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

GLDM

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: -8.20%
• 6M: -13.62%
• YTD: -7.79%
• 1Y: 18.77%
• 3Y*: 26.60%
• 5Y*: 16.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF	2.43%	2.53%	19.12%	45.87%	-47.45%	-11.24%	90.22%	36.98%	-12.08%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-7.79%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and GLDM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018	0.10

Return for Risk

XITK vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK

XITK Risk / Return Rank: 9
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 9
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 9

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 22
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XITK	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	0.68	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	1.02	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.15	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	0.72	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.13	1.71	-1.85

XITK vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XITK vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XITK	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.56%	-26.27%	-39.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.03%	-26.27%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.18%	-26.27%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.53%	-26.27%	-35.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.16%	-26.27%	-3.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.13%	-6.46%	-15.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.36%	10.98%	+1.38%

Volatility

XITK vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 6.61%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XITK	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.66%	6.61%	+3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.80%	24.06%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.67%	27.79%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.03%	18.32%	+14.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.66%	17.08%	+12.58%

XITK vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

XITK vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither XITK nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.11%	0.00%	0.06%	0.14%	1.50%	1.74%	1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XITK and GLDM in my portfolio?

XITK and GLDM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XITK or GLDM?

XITK has higher volatility (9.66%) compared to GLDM (6.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs GLDM's -26.27%.

Which ETF is better, XITK or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 16.93% vs -3.10% for XITK. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 6.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XITK or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 16.93% return vs -3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XITK or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XITK or GLDM?

XITK and GLDM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XITK and GLDM?

XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GLDM is Gold. XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.