XITK vs. GGTL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XITK is passively managed, while GGTL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XITK returned 13.32%/yr vs 21.77%/yr for GGTL. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GGTL.

Performance

XITK vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than GGTL's 24.82% return.

XITK

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -8.08%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: -0.80%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: -4.43%
• 10Y*: 13.96%

GGTL

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 24.82%
• 6M: 24.68%
• 1Y: 41.24%
• 3Y*: 21.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF	1.90%	2.53%	19.12%	45.87%	-45.97%
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	24.82%	19.78%	11.07%	18.17%	-16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and GGTL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2022	0.76

The correlation between XITK and GGTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

XITK vs. GGTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XITK	GGTL
Technology	82.4%	55.5%
Communication Services	10.4%	2.9%
Healthcare	3.1%	-
Industrials	1.6%	0.1%
Financial Services	1.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	0.9%
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XITK vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK

XITK Risk / Return Rank: 9
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 9
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 9

GGTL

GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 79
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XITK	GGTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	2.13	-2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	2.78	-2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.39	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	4.51	-4.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.07	15.19	-15.25

XITK vs. GGTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the GGTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and GGTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XITK vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than GGTL's maximum drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and GGTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XITK	GGTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.56%	-23.65%	-41.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.03%	-9.20%	-18.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.18%	-21.46%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.52%	-3.88%	-26.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.10%	-7.39%	-14.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.17%	2.72%	+9.45%

Volatility

XITK vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) at 10.73%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XITK	GGTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.20%	10.73%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.82%	16.89%	+6.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.92%	19.47%	+8.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.88%	18.19%	+14.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.71%	18.19%	+11.52%

XITK vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GGTL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

XITK vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison

XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	0.83%	1.04%	0.75%	0.84%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.11%	0.00%	0.06%	0.14%	1.50%	1.74%	1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XITK and GGTL in my portfolio?

XITK and GGTL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XITK or GGTL?

XITK has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to GGTL (10.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs GGTL's -23.65%.

Which ETF is better, XITK or GGTL?

On 3-year performance, GGTL leads with 21.77% vs 13.32% for XITK. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GGTL has been the lower-risk option at 10.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XITK or GGTL?

Over the 3-year period, GGTL has performed better with a 21.77% return vs 13.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XITK or GGTL?

XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XITK or GGTL?

GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

What is the main difference between XITK and GGTL?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.90% for GGTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.