PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XITK vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XITK vs. EINC

Last updated Jul 14, 2026
Documentation

XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XITK returned 13.16%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for EINC. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

XITK vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 28.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has outperformed EINC with an annualized return of 13.16%, while EINC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return.

XITK

1D
-1.63%
1M
-3.25%
6M
2.14%
YTD
5.29%
1Y
2.28%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
-2.94%
10Y*
13.16%

EINC

1D
1.55%
1M
1.87%
6M
30.32%
YTD
28.74%
1Y
32.69%
3Y*
28.67%
5Y*
22.43%
10Y*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF		5.29%2.53%19.12%45.87%-47.45%-11.24%90.22%36.98%7.60%36.01%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		28.74%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and EINC is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016

0.30

The correlation between XITK and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XITK vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XITK
EINC

Technology

82.4%

-

Communication Services

10.4%

-

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Industrials

1.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

1.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

99.4%

Utilities

-

0.6%

Technology

XITK
82.4%
EINC

-

Communication Services

XITK
10.4%
EINC

-

Healthcare

XITK
3.1%
EINC

-

Industrials

XITK
1.6%
EINC
0.6%

Financial Services

XITK
1.3%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

XITK
0.8%
EINC

-

Real Estate

XITK
0.4%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

XITK

-

EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

XITK

-

EINC

-

Energy

XITK

-

EINC
99.4%

Utilities

XITK

-

EINC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with XITK:
XITK vs. ARKKXITK vs. ARKWXITK vs. VGTXITK vs. WAMVXXITK vs. XNTKXITK vs. SCAPXITK vs. FSCSX
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

XITK vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XITK
XITK Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XITKEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.08
2.13

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.31
2.89

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.37

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

4.16

-4.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

10.24

-10.05

XITK vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XITK vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XITKEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.56%

-87.55%

+21.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-7.89%

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.18%

-16.01%

-12.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

-19.87%

-41.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.56%

-68.85%

+3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.21%

-2.40%

-25.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.12%

-44.01%

+21.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.30%

3.20%

+9.10%

Volatility

XITK vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.06%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XITKEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.16%

6.06%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.62%

12.30%

+12.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.54%

15.42%

+13.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.01%

19.58%

+13.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.66%

25.34%

+4.32%

XITK vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XITK and EINC have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

XITK vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.44%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.14%1.50%1.74%1.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XITK and EINC have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XITK has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to EINC (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 10-year performance, XITK leads with 13.16% vs 11.77% for EINC. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XITK has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XITK and EINC have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XITK and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer