PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EINC vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EINC and SMH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

EINC vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-18.19%
1,151.80%
EINC
SMH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EINC:

1.06

SMH:

-0.51

Sortino Ratio

EINC:

1.38

SMH:

-0.48

Omega Ratio

EINC:

1.21

SMH:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

EINC:

0.46

SMH:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

EINC:

5.65

SMH:

-1.53

Ulcer Index

EINC:

3.63%

SMH:

12.85%

Daily Std Dev

EINC:

19.32%

SMH:

38.51%

Max Drawdown

EINC:

-87.56%

SMH:

-83.29%

Current Drawdown

EINC:

-30.00%

SMH:

-35.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a -4.60% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's -25.34% return. Over the past 10 years, EINC has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 0.38%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 22.11% annualized return.


EINC

YTD

-4.60%

1M

-6.79%

6M

3.56%

1Y

21.16%

5Y*

34.59%

10Y*

0.38%

SMH

YTD

-25.34%

1M

-21.19%

6M

-26.72%

1Y

-17.41%

5Y*

27.34%

10Y*

22.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EINC vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for EINC: current value is 0.45%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
EINC: 0.45%
Expense ratio chart for SMH: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SMH: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EINC vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EINC is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EINC is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EINC is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EINC is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EINC is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EINC is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EINC vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EINC, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
EINC: 1.06
SMH: -0.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for EINC, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
EINC: 1.38
SMH: -0.48
The chart of Omega ratio for EINC, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
EINC: 1.21
SMH: 0.94
The chart of Calmar ratio for EINC, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
EINC: 0.46
SMH: -0.55
The chart of Martin ratio for EINC, currently valued at 5.65, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00
EINC: 5.65
SMH: -1.53

The current EINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EINC and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.06
-0.51
EINC
SMH

Dividends

EINC vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than SMH's 0.59% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
3.33%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%12.41%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.59%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

EINC vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.56%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-30.00%
-35.44%
EINC
SMH

Volatility

EINC vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) is 11.09%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.77%. This indicates that EINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.09%
14.77%
EINC
SMH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab