XITK vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XITK returned 14.07%/yr vs 123.86%/yr for BWET. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

XITK vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 968.33% return.

XITK

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: -3.90%
• 10Y*: 13.25%

BWET

• 1D: -5.48%
• 1M: 18.43%
• YTD: 968.33%
• 6M: 944.72%
• 1Y: 1,424.52%
• 3Y*: 123.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF	4.47%	2.53%	19.12%	37.60%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	968.33%	96.22%	-39.21%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and BWET is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.00

Return for Risk

XITK vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK

XITK Risk / Return Rank: 10
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 10
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XITK	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	14.65	-14.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	6.07	-5.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.87	-0.83
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	47.03	-46.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	147.28	-147.00

XITK vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XITK vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	XITK	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.56%	-56.90%	-8.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.03%	-30.64%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.18%	-56.81%	+28.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.77%	-5.48%	-23.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.09%	-23.76%	+1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.11%	11.60%	+0.51%

Volatility

XITK vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) is 12.69%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 26.27%. This indicates that XITK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XITK	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.69%	26.27%	-13.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.83%	89.01%	-65.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.99%	98.57%	-70.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.87%	70.47%	-37.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.72%	70.47%	-40.75%

XITK vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XITK vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

Neither XITK nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.11%	0.00%	0.06%	0.14%	1.50%	1.74%	1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XITK and BWET in my portfolio?

XITK and BWET have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XITK or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (26.27%) compared to XITK (12.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, XITK or BWET?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 123.86% vs 14.07% for XITK. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XITK has been the lower-risk option at 12.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XITK or BWET?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 123.86% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XITK or BWET?

XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XITK or BWET?

XITK and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XITK and BWET?

XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BWET is Commodities. XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.