XIACY vs. IAU
XIACY (Xiaomi Corporation) is a stock, while IAU (iShares Gold Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Over the past 3 years, XIACY returned 33.84%/yr vs 29.07%/yr for IAU. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XIACY vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIACY achieves a -33.94% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's -2.44% return.
XIACY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -17.62%
- YTD
- -33.94%
- 6M
- -38.82%
- 1Y
- -49.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
XIACY vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | -33.94% | 15.23% | 118.16% | 45.75% | -42.42% | -35.46% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | -2.44% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIACY and IAU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIACY vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
XIACY
IAU
XIACY vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIACY | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.19 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 0.99 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 2.83 | -4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIACY vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIACY drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIACY and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIACY | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.03% | -45.14% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.00% | -24.40% | -33.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.00% | -24.40% | -33.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.85% | -22.03% | -35.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.31% | -15.97% | -23.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.09% | 8.47% | +26.62% |
Volatility
XIACY vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) has a higher volatility of 10.81% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 7.70%. This indicates that XIACY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIACY | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.81% | 7.70% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.89% | 23.94% | +2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.10% | 27.17% | +11.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.49% | 18.16% | +28.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.49% | 16.02% | +30.47% |
Dividends
XIACY vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither XIACY nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XIACY and IAU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XIACY has higher volatility (10.81%) compared to IAU (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIACY dropped -71.03% vs IAU's -45.14%.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIACY and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer