XHS vs. GDOC
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC).
XHS and GDOC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2011. GDOC is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021.
Performance
XHS vs. GDOC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XHS vs. GDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | -6.26% | 18.83% | 1.76% | 5.15% | -19.87% | -3.84% |
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | -8.12% | 10.74% | -1.66% | 4.60% | -17.12% | -2.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly higher than GDOC's -8.12% return.
XHS
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- -6.26%
- 6M
- -1.26%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.33%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
GDOC
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- -8.12%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 1.53%
- 3Y*
- 0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHS vs. GDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDOC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XHS vs. GDOC — Risk / Return Rank
XHS
GDOC
XHS vs. GDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHS | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.12 | 0.08 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.30 | 0.25 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.03 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 0.10 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 0.31 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHS | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 0.08 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.20 | +0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between XHS and GDOC is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XHS vs. GDOC - Dividend Comparison
XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than GDOC's 0.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.29% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XHS vs. GDOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than GDOC's maximum drawdown of -31.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and GDOC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHS | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -31.01% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -14.57% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.33% | -15.86% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -15.90% | +5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 4.96% | -0.43% |
Volatility
XHS vs. GDOC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) is 4.98%, while Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that XHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XHS | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 6.04% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 11.22% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 18.63% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 18.83% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 18.83% | +3.58% |