XHLF vs. XEMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHLF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index, while XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHLF returned 4.62%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for XEMD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHLF charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XEMD.

Performance

XHLF vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's 2.75% return.

XHLF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XEMD

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 11.88%
• 3Y*: 11.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHLF vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	1.39%	4.21%	5.04%	4.90%	0.96%
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	2.75%	13.98%	8.77%	10.26%	1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XHLF and XEMD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022	0.11

Return for Risk

XHLF vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHLF

XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

XEMD

XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 79
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHLF vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XHLF	XEMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	12.43	2.57	+9.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	45.85	3.88	+41.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	11.75	1.51	+10.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	98.81	3.39	+95.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	670.31	15.27	+655.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHLF vs. XEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 12.43, which is higher than the XEMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and XEMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XHLF	XEMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.43	2.57	+9.87
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	10.75	1.39	+9.35

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum XEMD drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and XEMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHLF	XEMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-10.01%	+9.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	-3.52%	+3.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.06%	-4.31%	+4.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-1.26%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	0.78%	-0.77%

Volatility

XHLF vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.08%, while BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHLF	XEMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	1.43%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.22%	3.70%	-3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32%	4.66%	-4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.42%	6.88%	-6.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.42%	6.88%	-6.46%

XHLF vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHLF vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than XEMD's 5.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	5.82%	6.15%	6.30%	6.19%	3.08%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.85%	3.98%	4.96%	4.50%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHLF and XEMD in my portfolio?

XHLF and XEMD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XHLF or XEMD?

XEMD has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to XHLF (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHLF dropped -0.11% vs XEMD's -10.01%.

Which ETF is better, XHLF or XEMD?

On 3-year performance, XEMD leads with 11.23% vs 4.62% for XHLF. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XHLF or XEMD?

Over the 3-year period, XEMD has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XHLF or XEMD?

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XEMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XHLF or XEMD?

XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 3.85% for XHLF.

What is the main difference between XHLF and XEMD?

XHLF is categorized as Government Bonds, while XEMD is Emerging Markets Bonds. XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index, while XEMD tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XHLF and 0.29% for XEMD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.43 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.