PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHLF vs. VGUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHLF vs. VGUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than VGUS's 1.59% return.


XHLF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.61%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
10Y*

VGUS

1D
0.01%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHLF vs. VGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XHLF and VGUS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHLF vs. VGUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHLF
XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VGUS
VGUS Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHLF vs. VGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XHLFVGUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

10.92

10.51

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

96.20

53.22

+42.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

638.15

402.91

+235.24

XHLF vs. VGUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 12.03, which is comparable to the VGUS Sharpe Ratio of 11.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and VGUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. VGUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, which is greater than VGUS's maximum drawdown of -0.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and VGUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHLFVGUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-0.07%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-0.07%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.00%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.01%

0.00%

Volatility

XHLF vs. VGUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.09%, while Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS) has a volatility of 0.12%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHLFVGUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

0.12%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.22%

0.18%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32%

0.33%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.42%

0.34%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.42%

0.34%

+0.08%

XHLF vs. VGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VGUS's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XHLF vs. VGUS - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than VGUS's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
VGUS
Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF
3.60%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.84%3.98%4.96%4.50%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHLF and VGUS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGUS has higher volatility (0.12%) compared to XHLF (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHLF dropped -0.11% vs VGUS's -0.07%.

On 1-year performance, VGUS leads with 3.86% vs 3.81% for XHLF. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGUS has performed better with a 3.86% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VGUS.

XHLF has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 3.60% for VGUS.

XHLF is categorized as Government Bonds, while VGUS is Ultrashort Bond. XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index, while VGUS tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for XHLF and 0.07% for VGUS.

XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.03 vs 11.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHLF and VGUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer