PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XHLF vs. LADR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XHLF and LADR is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.0

Performance

XHLF vs. LADR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.66%
18.50%
XHLF
LADR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XHLF:

12.27

LADR:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

XHLF:

38.45

LADR:

0.67

Omega Ratio

XHLF:

8.60

LADR:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

XHLF:

84.70

LADR:

0.36

Martin Ratio

XHLF:

482.73

LADR:

1.72

Ulcer Index

XHLF:

0.01%

LADR:

4.84%

Daily Std Dev

XHLF:

0.41%

LADR:

21.11%

Max Drawdown

XHLF:

-0.11%

LADR:

-81.63%

Current Drawdown

XHLF:

0.00%

LADR:

-16.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than LADR's -6.53% return.


XHLF

YTD

1.26%

1M

0.41%

6M

2.19%

1Y

5.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LADR

YTD

-6.53%

1M

-10.30%

6M

-4.58%

1Y

7.81%

5Y*

16.57%

10Y*

4.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XHLF vs. LADR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XHLF is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XHLF is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

LADR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LADR is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LADR is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LADR is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LADR is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LADR is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LADR is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XHLF vs. LADR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 12.27, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
XHLF: 12.27
LADR: 0.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 38.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
XHLF: 38.45
LADR: 0.67
The chart of Omega ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 8.60, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
XHLF: 8.60
LADR: 1.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 84.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
XHLF: 84.70
LADR: 0.55
The chart of Martin ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 482.73, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
XHLF: 482.73
LADR: 1.72

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 12.27, which is higher than the LADR Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and LADR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.27
0.39
XHLF
LADR

Dividends

XHLF vs. LADR - Dividend Comparison

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than LADR's 8.98% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.69%4.97%4.51%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
8.98%8.22%7.99%8.76%6.67%9.61%7.54%9.92%8.91%10.53%17.91%

Drawdowns

XHLF vs. LADR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum LADR drawdown of -81.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and LADR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril0
-11.91%
XHLF
LADR

Volatility

XHLF vs. LADR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.11%, while Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LADR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.11%
10.92%
XHLF
LADR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab