XHLF vs. LADR

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than LADR's -4.98% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 11.89, which is higher than the LADR Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and LADR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than LADR's 8.83% yield.

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum LADR drawdown of -81.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and LADR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.10%, while Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LADR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.