XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L
XGLS.L (Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XGLS.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (GBP Hedged), while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGLS.L returned 11.70%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for SSLN.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XGLS.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLS.L achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than SSLN.L's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XGLS.L has underperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 11.70%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.
XGLS.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 30.57%
- 3Y*
- 29.95%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 115.93%
- 3Y*
- 42.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLS.L Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC | 2.92% | 63.07% | 24.85% | 11.63% | -1.63% | -4.91% | 22.11% | 15.69% | -3.62% | 9.65% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 3.18% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLS.L and SSLN.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XGLS.L and SSLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGLS.L
SSLN.L
XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLS.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.98 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 6.53 | -2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLS.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.11 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.70 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.57 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.17 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -46.55%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLS.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLS.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.55% | -69.95% | +23.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.19% | -38.72% | +20.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -38.72% | +20.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -38.72% | +16.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.99% | -38.72% | +15.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.29% | -33.62% | +17.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.37% | -45.32% | +21.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.99% | 17.69% | -10.70% |
Volatility
XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) is 6.37%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that XGLS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLS.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 16.31% | -9.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.81% | 51.81% | -30.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.78% | 54.53% | -29.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 33.31% | -16.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 29.69% | -14.17% |
XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLS.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLS.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLS.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for XGLS.L.
XGLS.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while SSLN.L is Silver. XGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for XGLS.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XGLS.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer