XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L
XGLS.L (Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC) and EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XGLS.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (GBP Hedged), while EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGLS.L returned 16.90%/yr vs 19.71%/yr for EGLN.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XGLS.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EGLN.L.
Performance
XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGLS.L is traded in GBp, while EGLN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EGLN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLS.L achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than EGLN.L's 3.39% return.
XGLS.L
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- 29.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
EGLN.L
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLS.L Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC | 2.29% | 63.07% | 24.85% | 11.63% | -1.63% | -4.91% | 22.11% | 15.69% | -3.62% | 9.65% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.39% | 53.83% | 28.21% | 7.18% | 11.48% | -2.31% | 20.11% | 13.77% | 4.38% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLS.L and EGLN.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XGLS.L and EGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGLS.L
EGLN.L
XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLS.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.91 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 5.10 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLS.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.21 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.91 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -46.55%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLS.L and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLS.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.55% | -22.58% | -23.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.19% | -17.43% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -17.43% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -17.43% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.80% | -16.40% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.38% | -6.05% | -17.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 6.53% | +0.38% |
Volatility
XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 5.53%. This indicates that XGLS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLS.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 5.53% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.82% | 20.07% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.79% | 23.22% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 16.35% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 15.11% | +0.41% |
XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLS.L vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLS.L nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XGLS.L and EGLN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for XGLS.L.
XGLS.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while EGLN.L is Gold. XGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for XGLS.L and 0.25% for EGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XGLS.L and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer