XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) and Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE).
XGLS.L and 4GLD.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGLS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold (GBP Hedged). It was launched on Apr 1, 2011. 4GLD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xetra that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Nov 27, 2007. Both XGLS.L and 4GLD.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLS.L Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC | 6.53% | 63.07% | 24.85% | 11.63% | -1.63% | -4.91% | 22.11% | 15.69% | -3.62% | 9.65% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold ETF | 7.38% | 57.09% | 28.71% | 7.13% | 12.98% | -3.31% | 19.44% | 14.94% | 4.66% | 2.53% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGLS.L is traded in GBp, while 4GLD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 4GLD.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLS.L achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XGLS.L has underperformed 4GLD.DE with an annualized return of 12.38%, while 4GLD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.17% annualized return.
XGLS.L
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -11.95%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 19.35%
- 1Y
- 45.55%
- 3Y*
- 30.85%
- 5Y*
- 20.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -11.14%
- YTD
- 7.38%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 45.01%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 22.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGLS.L
4GLD.DE
XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) and Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLS.L | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 1.87 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 2.34 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.61 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.76 | 10.76 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLS.L | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.87 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | 1.41 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.95 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.68 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLS.L and 4GLD.DE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLS.L nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -46.55%, which is greater than 4GLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLS.L and 4GLD.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLS.L | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.55% | -36.79% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.19% | -16.54% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.87% | -16.54% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.99% | -18.23% | -4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.35% | -11.47% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -11.83% | -11.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.64% | 4.34% | +0.30% |
Volatility
XGLS.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (XGLS.L) and Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) have volatilities of 11.58% and 11.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGLS.L | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.58% | 11.34% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.04% | 20.87% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 24.05% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 16.01% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 15.75% | -0.38% |