XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO
XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and RGPM.NEO (RBC Global Precious Metals Fund) are both Precious Metals funds. XGDU.DE is passively managed, while RGPM.NEO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XGDU.DE returned 27.75%/yr vs 40.40%/yr for RGPM.NEO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGDU.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for RGPM.NEO.
Performance
XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGDU.DE is traded in EUR, while RGPM.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RGPM.NEO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than RGPM.NEO's 2.53% return.
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 19.58%
- 10Y*
- —
RGPM.NEO
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 57.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 2.16% | 49.11% | 34.18% | 7.19% |
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | 2.53% | 125.25% | 34.26% | -4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.DE and RGPM.NEO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, XGDU.DE and RGPM.NEO have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
XGDU.DE
RGPM.NEO
XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGDU.DE | RGPM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.99 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 5.27 | -0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGDU.DE | RGPM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.21 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum RGPM.NEO drawdown of -28.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and RGPM.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDU.DE | RGPM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -28.95% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -28.95% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -28.95% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -23.58% | +8.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -8.51% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 10.88% | -4.40% |
Volatility
XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) is 5.51%, while RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) has a volatility of 15.78%. This indicates that XGDU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGPM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGDU.DE | RGPM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 15.78% | -10.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.20% | 35.25% | -15.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 42.66% | -19.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 32.70% | -16.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 32.70% | -16.92% |
XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RGPM.NEO's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGDU.DE vs. RGPM.NEO - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGDU.DE nor RGPM.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGDU.DE and RGPM.NEO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for RGPM.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and RBC Global Asset Management.. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 1.02% for RGPM.NEO.
Find the right allocation for XGDU.DE and RGPM.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer