XGDU.DE vs. GDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX).
XGDU.DE and GDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGDU.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Apr 22, 2020. GDX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. It was launched on May 22, 2006. Both XGDU.DE and GDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XGDU.DE or GDX.
Key characteristics
XGDU.DE | GDX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 24.05% | 28.09% |
1Y Return | 27.67% | 35.89% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 15.21% | 11.15% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.05 | 1.17 |
Daily Std Dev | 13.42% | 32.00% |
Max Drawdown | -18.74% | -80.57% |
Current Drawdown | -0.37% | -33.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.DE and GDX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XGDU.DE vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a 24.05% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 28.09% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGDU.DE vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XGDU.DE vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XGDU.DE vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
XGDU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 1.26% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% | 0.66% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
XGDU.DE vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and GDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XGDU.DE vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) is 3.62%, while VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that XGDU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.