XFEB vs. CIBR
XFEB (FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. XFEB is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past year, XFEB returned 11.76% vs 18.97% for CIBR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
XFEB vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFEB achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 21.55% return.
XFEB
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 3.94%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 11.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 23.56%
- YTD
- 21.55%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.73%
XFEB vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 3.94% | 9.12% | 9.39% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 21.55% | 13.06% | 11.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFEB and CIBR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XFEB and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFEB vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
XFEB
CIBR
XFEB vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XFEB | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.15 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 0.87 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.74 | 2.05 | +14.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XFEB | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 0.77 | +1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.64 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
XFEB vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.07%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFEB and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFEB | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -33.89% | +24.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.12% | -21.99% | +17.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -8.08% | +7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -8.66% | +8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 9.27% | -8.57% |
Volatility
XFEB vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February (XFEB) is 0.87%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that XFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFEB | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 12.36% | -11.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.78% | 21.41% | -17.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.50% | 24.91% | -20.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.10% | 25.02% | -17.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.10% | 23.64% | -16.54% |
XFEB vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFEB vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
XFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
XFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XFEB and CIBR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to XFEB (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFEB dropped -9.07% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.97% vs 11.76% for XFEB. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XFEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.97% return vs 11.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFEB.
CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for XFEB.
XFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFEB and 0.60% for CIBR.
XFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XFEB and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer