PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. RAYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XES

1D
3.09%
1M
4.23%
6M
12.93%
YTD
36.38%
1Y
76.64%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
17.17%
10Y*
-2.88%
ALL TIME*
-3.56%

RAYS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$5.46M$8.52M$12.51M

XES vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


XES vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XES
RAYS

Energy

97.7%

-

Industrials

2.3%
21.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

66.9%

Utilities

-

6.8%

Energy

XES
97.7%
RAYS

-

Industrials

XES
2.3%
RAYS
21.4%

Basic Materials

XES

-

RAYS
0.9%

Communication Services

XES

-

RAYS

-

Consumer Cyclical

XES

-

RAYS
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

XES

-

RAYS

-

Financial Services

XES

-

RAYS

-

Healthcare

XES

-

RAYS

-

Real Estate

XES

-

RAYS

-

Technology

XES

-

RAYS
66.9%

Utilities

XES

-

RAYS
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RAYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XES vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XESRAYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

XES vs. RAYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XES vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and RAYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESRAYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

0.00%

-95.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.66%

0.00%

-73.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

0.00%

-54.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.73%

Volatility

XES vs. RAYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESRAYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.74%

0.00%

+30.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.63%

0.00%

+38.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.85%

0.00%

+44.85%

XES vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XES vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.17%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.

XES has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.

XES is categorized as Energy Equities, while RAYS is Alternative Energy Equities. XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.50% for RAYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and RAYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer