XES vs. EWZ
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) and EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XES is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while EWZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XES returned -4.13%/yr vs 6.86%/yr for EWZ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XES charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWZ.
Performance
XES vs. EWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 37.45% return, which is significantly higher than EWZ's 14.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed EWZ with an annualized return of -4.13%, while EWZ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.86% annualized return.
XES
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- 6M
- 26.49%
- YTD
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 65.04%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.19%
- 10Y*
- -4.13%
EWZ
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 36.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.86%
XES vs. EWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 37.45% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 14.17% | 48.81% | -30.41% | 32.62% | 12.09% | -17.32% | -20.35% | 27.67% | -2.52% | 23.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and EWZ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XES and EWZ has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XES vs. EWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XES
EWZ
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XES
EWZ
Industrials
XES
EWZ
Basic Materials
XES
-
EWZ
Communication Services
XES
-
EWZ
Consumer Cyclical
XES
-
EWZ
Consumer Defensive
XES
-
EWZ
Financial Services
XES
-
EWZ
Healthcare
XES
-
EWZ
Real Estate
XES
-
EWZ
-
Technology
XES
-
EWZ
Utilities
XES
-
EWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. EWZ — Risk / Return Rank
XES
EWZ
XES vs. EWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XES | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 1.85 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.53 | 4.94 | +6.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XES vs. EWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than EWZ's maximum drawdown of -77.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and EWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -77.25% | -18.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.69% | -19.27% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -31.36% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -32.24% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | -56.99% | -34.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.46% | -20.49% | -52.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.44% | -35.90% | -18.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 7.20% | -1.50% |
Volatility
XES vs. EWZ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) at 5.74%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 5.74% | +3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.50% | 19.70% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.96% | 24.98% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.85% | 27.60% | +11.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.88% | 33.90% | +10.98% |
XES vs. EWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EWZ's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XES vs. EWZ - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than EWZ's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 4.07% | 5.19% | 8.91% | 5.66% | 12.59% | 9.87% | 1.71% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 1.71% | 1.81% | 4.08% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.16% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XES and EWZ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XES has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to EWZ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs EWZ's -77.25%.
On 10-year performance, EWZ leads with 6.86% vs -4.13% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWZ has performed better with a 6.86% return vs -4.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZ.
EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.16% for XES.
XES is categorized as Energy Equities, while EWZ is Latin America Equities. XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.59% for EWZ.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XES and EWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer