XES vs. CRAK
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index while CRAK tracks the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XES returned -2.41%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for CRAK. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XES charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.
Performance
XES vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 51.54% return, which is significantly higher than CRAK's 32.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed CRAK with an annualized return of -2.41%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.
XES
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 51.54%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- 106.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- -2.41%
CRAK
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 32.49%
- 6M
- 27.90%
- 1Y
- 67.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
XES vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 51.54% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 32.49% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 13.73% | 19.10% | 10.90% | -11.22% | 9.15% | -10.46% | 49.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and CRAK is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XES and CRAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XES vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XES
CRAK
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XES
CRAK
Industrials
XES
CRAK
Basic Materials
XES
-
CRAK
Communication Services
XES
-
CRAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
XES
-
CRAK
-
Consumer Defensive
XES
-
CRAK
-
Financial Services
XES
-
CRAK
-
Healthcare
XES
-
CRAK
-
Real Estate
XES
-
CRAK
-
Technology
XES
-
CRAK
-
Utilities
XES
-
CRAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank
XES
CRAK
XES vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XES | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.52 | 3.72 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 4.78 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.62 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.21 | 8.08 | +3.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.56 | 23.02 | +7.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XES | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 3.72 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.66 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.60 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.54 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
XES vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than CRAK's maximum drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and CRAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -58.80% | -36.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -8.57% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -35.61% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -35.61% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | -58.80% | -32.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.73% | -4.35% | -66.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.36% | -12.50% | -41.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 3.01% | +0.60% |
Volatility
XES vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.72%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 6.72% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.51% | 14.27% | +6.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.52% | 18.35% | +12.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.04% | 20.61% | +18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.05% | 22.17% | +22.88% |
XES vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
XES vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than CRAK's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.52% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.12% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XES and CRAK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XES has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to CRAK (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs CRAK's -58.80%.
On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.22% vs -2.41% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.22% return vs -2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.
CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.12% for XES.
XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.62% for CRAK.
CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 3.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XES and CRAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer