PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. CRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 51.54% return, which is significantly higher than CRAK's 32.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed CRAK with an annualized return of -2.41%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.


XES

1D
2.58%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
51.54%
6M
51.49%
1Y
106.77%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
-2.41%

CRAK

1D
1.30%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
32.49%
6M
27.90%
1Y
67.95%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XES vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
51.54%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
32.49%39.11%-15.05%13.73%19.10%10.90%-11.22%9.15%-10.46%49.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XES and CRAK is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015

0.62

The correlation between XES and CRAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XES vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XES
CRAK

Energy

97.5%
98.9%

Industrials

2.5%
4.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XES
97.5%
CRAK
98.9%

Industrials

XES
2.5%
CRAK
4.0%

Basic Materials

XES

-

CRAK
1.1%

Communication Services

XES

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

XES

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Defensive

XES

-

CRAK

-

Financial Services

XES

-

CRAK

-

Healthcare

XES

-

CRAK

-

Real Estate

XES

-

CRAK

-

Technology

XES

-

CRAK

-

Utilities

XES

-

CRAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XES vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XESCRAKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.52

3.72

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

4.78

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.62

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.21

8.08

+3.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.56

23.02

+7.54

XES vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is comparable to the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XESCRAKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

3.72

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.66

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.60

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.54

-0.61

Drawdowns

XES vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than CRAK's maximum drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and CRAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESCRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-58.80%

-36.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-8.57%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-35.61%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-35.61%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

-58.80%

-32.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.73%

-4.35%

-66.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.36%

-12.50%

-41.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.01%

+0.60%

Volatility

XES vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.72%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESCRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

6.72%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

14.27%

+6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

18.35%

+12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.04%

20.61%

+18.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.05%

22.17%

+22.88%

XES vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

XES vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than CRAK's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
1.52%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.12%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XES and CRAK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to CRAK (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.22% vs -2.41% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.22% return vs -2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.12% for XES.

XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 3.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and CRAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer