PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEMD vs. XHLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XEMD vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XEMD vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
-0.24%13.98%8.77%10.26%1.30%
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.78%4.21%5.04%4.90%0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than XHLF's 0.78% return.


XEMD

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
3.46%
1Y
10.90%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
10Y*

XHLF

1D
0.01%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XEMD vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XEMD vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XHLF
XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMD vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEMDXHLFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

12.09

-10.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

39.75

-37.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

9.67

-8.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

99.61

-96.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.31

605.40

-592.09

XEMD vs. XHLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the XHLF Sharpe Ratio of 12.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD and XHLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEMDXHLFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

12.09

-10.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

10.74

-9.41

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD and XHLF is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XEMD vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

XEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than XHLF's 3.88% yield.


Drawdowns

XEMD vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD and XHLF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMDXHLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-0.11%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-0.04%

-3.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

0.00%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.01%

+0.83%

Volatility

XEMD vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) at 0.09%. This indicates that XEMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XEMDXHLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

0.09%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

0.21%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

0.33%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

0.42%

+6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.94%

0.42%

+6.52%