XDQQ vs. HOOG
XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XDQQ returned 13.89% vs -32.64% for HOOG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.
Performance
XDQQ vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -30.45% return.
XDQQ
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
HOOG
- 1D
- 6.34%
- 1M
- 41.93%
- 6M
- -37.65%
- YTD
- -30.45%
- 1Y
- -32.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDQQ vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 1.47% | 21.57% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -30.45% | 320.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDQQ and HOOG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XDQQ and HOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDQQ vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank
XDQQ
HOOG
XDQQ vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDQQ | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.07 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | -0.38 | +1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | -0.56 | +5.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDQQ vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and HOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDQQ | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.63% | -86.94% | +51.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -86.94% | +75.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -67.56% | +66.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -40.38% | +29.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 58.37% | -55.74% |
Volatility
XDQQ vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) is 4.15%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 36.80%. This indicates that XDQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDQQ | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 36.80% | -32.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.70% | 104.63% | -93.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 138.18% | -123.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 144.09% | -124.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 144.09% | -124.56% |
XDQQ vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDQQ vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison
XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 17.69% | 12.30% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDQQ and HOOG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOG has higher volatility (36.80%) compared to XDQQ (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs HOOG's -86.94%.
On 1-year performance, XDQQ leads with 13.89% vs -32.64% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XDQQ has performed better with a 13.89% return vs -32.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 17.69%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.75% for HOOG.
XDQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDQQ and HOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer