PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDQQ vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDQQ vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -30.45% return.


XDQQ

1D
1.09%
1M
-1.14%
6M
0.05%
YTD
1.47%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*

HOOG

1D
6.34%
1M
41.93%
6M
-37.65%
YTD
-30.45%
1Y
-32.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDQQ vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDQQ and HOOG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.54

The correlation between XDQQ and HOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDQQ vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDQQ
XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDQQ vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDQQHOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.07

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

-0.38

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.29

-0.56

+5.85

XDQQ vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDQQ and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDQQ vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDQQHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-86.94%

+51.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-86.94%

+75.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-67.56%

+66.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-40.38%

+29.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

58.37%

-55.74%

Volatility

XDQQ vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) is 4.15%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 36.80%. This indicates that XDQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDQQHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

36.80%

-32.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

104.63%

-93.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

138.18%

-123.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

144.09%

-124.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

144.09%

-124.56%

XDQQ vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDQQ vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.69%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XDQQ and HOOG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (36.80%) compared to XDQQ (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

On 1-year performance, XDQQ leads with 13.89% vs -32.64% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XDQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDQQ has performed better with a 13.89% return vs -32.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 17.69%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.75% for HOOG.

XDQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDQQ and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer