XDQQ vs. RSSB
XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) and RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while RSSB is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XDQQ returned 8.25% vs 19.46% for RSSB. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XDQQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RSSB.
Performance
XDQQ vs. RSSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDQQ achieves a -3.31% return, which is significantly lower than RSSB's 7.52% return.
XDQQ
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.60%
RSSB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 1Y
- 19.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.36M | $1.99M | $1.95M | |
| $486.75K | $670.10K | $337.67K |
XDQQ vs. RSSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | -3.31% | 13.75% | 31.47% | 1.44% |
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF | 7.52% | 25.16% | 10.53% | 6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDQQ and RSSB is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between XDQQ and RSSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDQQ vs. RSSB — Risk / Return Rank
XDQQ
RSSB
XDQQ vs. RSSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDQQ | RSSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.22 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 1.70 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 6.54 | -4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDQQ vs. RSSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDQQ drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, which is greater than RSSB's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDQQ and RSSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDQQ | RSSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.63% | -16.21% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -11.63% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -3.06% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -2.27% | -8.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.01% | -0.06% |
Volatility
XDQQ vs. RSSB - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) at 4.43%. This indicates that XDQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDQQ | RSSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 4.43% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 13.38% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 16.39% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 16.73% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 16.73% | +2.88% |
XDQQ vs. RSSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDQQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDQQ vs. RSSB - Dividend Comparison
XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF | 3.24% | 3.48% | 1.10% | 0.61% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDQQ and RSSB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDQQ has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to RSSB (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDQQ dropped -35.63% vs RSSB's -16.21%.
On 1-year performance, RSSB leads with 19.46% vs 8.25% for XDQQ. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RSSB has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSSB has performed better with a 19.46% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSSB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.
RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.
XDQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RSSB is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDQQ and 0.39% for RSSB.
RSSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDQQ and RSSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer