XDEF vs. DBJP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.

Performance

XDEF vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XDEF

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBJP

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 8.88%
• YTD: 20.51%
• 6M: 24.02%
• 1Y: 52.66%
• 3Y*: 29.04%
• 5Y*: 21.44%
• 10Y*: 16.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEF vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF	-99.17%
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	19.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEF and DBJP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

XDEF vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBJP

DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 86
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEF vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDEF	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	0.68	-1.32

Drawdowns

XDEF vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and DBJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDEF	DBJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.30%	-31.30%	-68.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.39%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.26%	0.00%	-99.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.45%	-7.29%	-63.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDEF	DBJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	157.63%	18.69%	+138.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	157.63%	18.93%	+138.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	157.63%	19.46%	+138.17%

XDEF vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEF vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

XDEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	2.34%	2.81%	2.80%	5.21%	0.80%	2.30%	2.53%	2.56%	3.87%	2.07%	1.13%	5.95%
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDEF and DBJP in my portfolio?

XDEF and DBJP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDEF or DBJP?

On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDEF or DBJP?

XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDEF or DBJP?

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.00% for XDEF.

What is the main difference between XDEF and DBJP?

XDEF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DBJP is Japan Equities. XDEF tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Defence, Space and Cybersecurity Innovation 50-25 Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 0.45% for DBJP.