PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEF vs. DRNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDEF vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDEF vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


XDEF

1D
5.06%
1M
-8.83%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRNZ

1D
4.34%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
9.89%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDEF vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XDEF vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDEF vs. DRNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEFDRNZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

-0.10

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between XDEF and DRNZ is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XDEF vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEF nor DRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XDEF vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and DRNZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEFDRNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-24.52%

-74.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.23%

-17.41%

-81.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.34%

-10.89%

-38.45%

Volatility

XDEF vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDEFDRNZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

205.45%

51.35%

+154.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

205.45%

51.35%

+154.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

205.45%

51.35%

+154.10%