XDEF vs. ARKX
XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) and ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. XDEF is passively managed, while ARKX is actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XDEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKX.
Performance
XDEF vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XDEF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -99.17%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARKX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -9.65%
- 6M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 19.77%
- 3Y*
- 25.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.56M | $23.90M | $44.78M | |
| $25.38K | $19.51K | $30.56K |
XDEF vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | -99.10% |
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEF and ARKX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEF vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank
XDEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARKX
XDEF vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEF vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEF drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than ARKX's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEF and ARKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -43.61% | -55.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.21% | -18.92% | -80.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.91% | -19.79% | -58.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.41% | — |
Volatility
XDEF vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEF | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 134.34% | 33.91% | +100.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 134.34% | 28.38% | +105.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 134.34% | 27.76% | +106.58% |
XDEF vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEF vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison
XDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while ARKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 0.00% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEF and ARKX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKX.
XDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.00% for ARKX.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XDEF and 0.75% for ARKX.
Find the right allocation for XDEF and ARKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer