XDAT vs. HDV
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. XDAT is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned -1.82%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for HDV. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
XDAT vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 19.66% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- -1.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.44%
HDV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $168.30M | $156.51M | $108.57M | |
| $42.52K | $24.92K | $17.00K |
XDAT vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | -0.52% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -45.71% | 9.61% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 19.66% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and HDV is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2021 | 0.19 |
The correlation between XDAT and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDAT vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDAT
HDV
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XDAT
HDV
Communication Services
XDAT
HDV
Real Estate
XDAT
HDV
-
Healthcare
XDAT
HDV
Financial Services
XDAT
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
XDAT
HDV
Industrials
XDAT
HDV
Basic Materials
XDAT
-
HDV
Consumer Defensive
XDAT
-
HDV
Energy
XDAT
-
HDV
Utilities
XDAT
-
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
HDV
XDAT vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDAT | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.41 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 4.90 | -4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 13.39 | -13.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -37.04% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -5.18% | -24.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -10.49% | -19.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | -15.42% | -39.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.77% | -1.72% | -15.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -3.06% | -22.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.89% | 1.89% | +13.00% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 4.52%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 4.52% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.83% | 8.66% | +12.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.26% | 10.83% | +14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 12.95% | +16.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 15.79% | +13.58% |
XDAT vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.08% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and HDV have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDAT has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to HDV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 5-year performance, HDV leads with 12.13% vs -1.82% for XDAT. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDV has performed better with a 12.13% return vs -1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer