XDAT vs. DFAU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU).

XDAT and DFAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDAT is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 12, 2021. DFAU is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 17, 2020.

Performance

XDAT vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XDAT vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	-18.30%	1.87%	16.54%	45.77%	-45.71%	10.86%
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	-2.67%	16.78%	23.17%	24.79%	-16.99%	23.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -18.30% return, which is significantly lower than DFAU's -2.67% return.

XDAT

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: -18.30%
• 6M: -24.16%
• 1Y: -7.10%
• 3Y*: 7.89%
• 5Y*: -2.44%
• 10Y*: —

DFAU

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: -2.67%
• 6M: -0.51%
• 1Y: 19.02%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 11.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAT vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio.

XDAT

Franklin Exponential Data ETF

DFAU

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

Return for Risk

XDAT vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAT

XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 8
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

DFAU

DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 61
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAT vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDAT	DFAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	1.03	-1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	1.56	-1.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.24	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	1.56	-1.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	7.42	-7.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDAT vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAT and DFAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDAT	DFAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	1.03	-1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	0.66	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.80	-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between XDAT and DFAU is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XDAT vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	1.03%	0.95%	1.10%	1.29%	1.40%	1.00%	0.13%

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and DFAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDAT	DFAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.87%	-23.61%	-31.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.56%	-12.45%	-17.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.87%	-23.61%	-31.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.65%	-5.36%	-26.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-5.12%	-20.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.33%	2.62%	+8.71%

Volatility

XDAT vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) at 5.39%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDAT	DFAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	5.39%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.64%	9.67%	+7.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.04%	18.52%	+8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.29%	17.03%	+12.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.44%	16.87%	+12.57%