PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DFAU vs. FBCG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


DFAUFBCG
YTD Return26.02%38.77%
1Y Return39.82%53.91%
3Y Return (Ann)9.62%8.52%
Sharpe Ratio3.072.67
Sortino Ratio4.113.40
Omega Ratio1.581.47
Calmar Ratio4.543.01
Martin Ratio19.8212.98
Ulcer Index1.96%4.05%
Daily Std Dev12.61%19.70%
Max Drawdown-23.61%-43.56%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between DFAU and FBCG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

DFAU vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 38.77% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.22%
19.10%
DFAU
FBCG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFAU vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.


FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for FBCG: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%
Expense ratio chart for DFAU: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFAU vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DFAU, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DFAU, currently valued at 4.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DFAU, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DFAU, currently valued at 4.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DFAU, currently valued at 19.82, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0019.82
FBCG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBCG, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBCG, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBCG, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBCG, currently valued at 3.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBCG, currently valued at 12.98, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.98

DFAU vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.07
2.67
DFAU
FBCG

Dividends

DFAU vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than FBCG's 0.02% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
1.02%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and FBCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
DFAU
FBCG

Volatility

DFAU vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) is 4.17%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that DFAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.17%
5.53%
DFAU
FBCG