XDAT vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

XDAT vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XDAT

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: -5.68%
• 6M: -4.38%
• 1Y: -7.72%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: -1.38%
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 6.96%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAT vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.26%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	35.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAT and ARMH is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.72

Return for Risk

XDAT vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAT

XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 6
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAT vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDAT	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	—	—

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDAT	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.87%	-24.85%	-30.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.09%	0.00%	-21.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.85%	-7.67%	-18.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDAT	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.49%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.29%	118.40%	-94.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.54%	118.40%	-88.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.45%	118.40%	-88.95%

XDAT vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDAT vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDAT nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDAT and ARMH in my portfolio?

XDAT and ARMH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDAT or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDAT or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDAT or ARMH?

XDAT and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XDAT and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.19% for ARMH.