XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE
XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) and DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - XCS7.DE tracks the MSCI China while DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCS7.DE returned 7.69%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for DBX9.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCS7.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DBX9.DE.
Performance
XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS7.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than DBX9.DE's 9.85% return.
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.89% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | 1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS7.DE and DBX9.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XCS7.DE and DBX9.DE has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS7.DE
DBX9.DE
XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS7.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.34 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.90 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 3.67 | -3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS7.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.24 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.08 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, smaller than the maximum DBX9.DE drawdown of -66.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS7.DE and DBX9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS7.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.62% | -66.51% | +29.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -17.20% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -27.83% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.97% | -14.62% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.59% | -29.50% | +13.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | 8.91% | -0.73% |
Volatility
XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) at 5.29%. This indicates that XCS7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBX9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS7.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 5.29% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 10.45% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 26.35% | -7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 28.75% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 25.42% | +0.23% |
XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS7.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than DBX9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS7.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS7.DE and DBX9.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCS7.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCS7.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China, while DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XCS7.DE and 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS7.DE and DBX9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer