XCS7.DE vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
XCS7.DE and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCS7.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China. It was launched on Apr 20, 2022. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both XCS7.DE and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.25% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -4.20% | 16.82% | 25.79% | -13.88% | 3.04% |
Different Trading Currencies
XCS7.DE is traded in EUR, while FLCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS7.DE achieves a -6.25% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -4.20% return.
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -6.25%
- 6M
- -12.83%
- 1Y
- -2.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 6M
- -11.32%
- 1Y
- 0.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS7.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
XCS7.DE
FLCH
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS7.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 0.01 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.01 | 0.18 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.04 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 0.11 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS7.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 0.01 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.02 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS7.DE and FLCH is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than FLCH's 2.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.10% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS7.DE and FLCH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS7.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.62% | -62.09% | +25.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -16.65% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.39% | -33.49% | +19.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.67% | -30.50% | +14.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 6.02% | +0.55% |
Volatility
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) have volatilities of 6.04% and 6.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCS7.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 6.20% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 13.89% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 23.29% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 28.29% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 27.26% | -1.44% |