XCS7.DE vs. FLCH
XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both China Equities funds - XCS7.DE tracks the MSCI China while FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCS7.DE returned 7.69%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for FLCH. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCS7.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCS7.DE is traded in EUR, while FLCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS7.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -5.53% return.
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -5.53%
- 6M
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.11%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.89% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.53% | 16.82% | 25.79% | -13.88% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS7.DE and FLCH is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between XCS7.DE and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
XCS7.DE
FLCH
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS7.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.05 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.28 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 0.58 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS7.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.22 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.02 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS7.DE and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS7.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.62% | -55.61% | +18.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -15.02% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -24.49% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.97% | -31.75% | +16.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.59% | -25.77% | +10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | 7.16% | +1.02% |
Volatility
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.13%. This indicates that XCS7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS7.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 6.13% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 13.03% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 18.73% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 28.32% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 27.10% | -1.45% |
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS7.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS7.DE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than FLCH's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.53% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS7.DE and FLCH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XCS7.DE.
XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XCS7.DE and 0.19% for FLCH.
Find the right allocation for XCS7.DE and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer